Let's dive into a comparison of the Scubapro G2 and the Shearwater Perdix 2 to determine which may suit different divers' needs better. Both are high-end dive computers, and each has strengths depending on what you value most in a diving computer.
Scubapro G2
Screen: The Scubapro G2 has a full-color TFT display that's easy to read in different lighting conditions, especially helpful for divers who need clear visual cues at a glance.
User Interface: It offers a more user-friendly interface, especially for recreational divers. The menu is straightforward, and the G2’s layout and design make it intuitive for most users.
Features: The G2 supports up to 9 gas mixes and has customizable screen layouts to prioritize information most important to the diver. It also comes with a heart rate monitor integration, which is helpful for those looking to track exertion during a dive.
Battery Life: It features a rechargeable battery with good longevity, though not quite as extended as the Perdix 2’s.
Integrated Compass: Scubapro’s compass is known for reliability and ease of use, an asset for navigation-focused divers.
Bluetooth Connectivity: It allows easy download and sharing of dive logs via Bluetooth, which is convenient for recording dives on various devices.
Shearwater Perdix 2
Screen: The Perdix 2 has a bright, full-color AMOLED display, known for superb clarity. Many divers find it more readable than the G2’s, especially in dim or low-visibility environments.
User Interface: Shearwater’s interface is known for being highly customizable and adaptable to both recreational and technical divers. It may require a learning curve but offers significant depth and flexibility.
Features: The Perdix 2 supports multiple gas mixes (up to 5 for diving) and advanced decompression models, making it very attractive for technical divers who want control over dive planning. It also offers options for sidemount and closed-circuit rebreather (CCR) diving, something technical divers highly value.
Battery Life: Its user-replaceable AA battery option is a huge plus for divers on extended trips or remote locations, allowing easy battery swaps without special charging equipment.
Durability: The Perdix 2 is notably rugged, with a titanium bezel and an increased depth rating to 200m, making it ideal for extreme environments and deep dives.
Air Integration: While both models offer air integration, Shearwater’s implementation is known for reliable, easy connectivity, and their transmitters have an excellent range.
Verdict
For Recreational Divers: The Scubapro G2 might be the better choice due to its more straightforward interface, focus on ease of use, and integrated heart rate monitor. The TFT screen, while less durable than the Perdix 2’s, is readable and visually appealing for typical recreational depths.
For Technical Divers: The Shearwater Perdix 2 is the go-to option. Its customizable interface, superior battery flexibility, advanced technical diving support, and robust durability make it ideal for divers pushing into deeper or more challenging environments.
In summary, the Perdix 2 is generally considered the better choice for serious technical and extended-range diving, while the G2 shines for recreational divers looking for a visually appealing, user-friendly option with solid functionality for everyday diving.
Comparison of the Scubapro G2 and the Shearwater Perdix 2
- scubadiver.ro
- Admin
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 7:42 pm
- Numar de scufundari: peste 1000
- Certificare/acreditare: INSTRUCTOR NAUI SSI
- Location: Bucuresti
- Contact: